Vioxx Heart Attack & Stroke

FAQ

Vioxx (rofecoxib) is a COX-2 inhibitor anti-inflammatory medication which was used as a pain reliever for disorders such as arthritis. Vioxx and several other COX-2 inhibitors were discontinued due to serious side effects caused by the drugs.

Drug Warning: Vioxx

Vioxx is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug which works by inhibiting the COX-2 enzyme, partially responsible for inflammatory diseases.

Vioxx was approved to treat:

• Osteoarthritis
• Rheumatoid arthritis
• Acute pain
• Painful menstruation
• Juvenile arthritis
• Migraine attacks

Due to serious side effects and after the withdrawal of Bextra, another COX-2 inhibitor, Vioxx was voluntarily discontinued from the U.S. market in 2004.

Vioxx Side Effects

Though Vioxx was developed to have fewer side effects than ibuprofen and older members of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug class (NSAID), COX-2 inhibitors may cause certain adverse events or side effects, some of which may be serious.

Common side effects of Vioxx may include:

• Nausea
• Abdominal pain
• Heartburn
• Dizziness
• Rash
• High blood pressure
• Lower extremity edema

More serious side effects of Celebrex may include

• Stomach or gastrointestinal bleeding
• Cardiovascular events such as stroke and heart attack
• Cardiac effects such as hypertension, changes in heart rhythm, and heart failure
• Kidney damage
• Liver damage
• Exacerbation of Aspiring-related asthma
• Serious skin condition including exfoliative dermatitis, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)
• Anaphylactic reaction (severe allergic reaction)
• Premature closure of Fetal Ductus Arteriosus (Birth Defect)

Symptoms of serious Vioxx side effects should be reported to a physician immediately. Symptoms of heart attack or stroke, difficulty breathing, loss of consciousness, lack of urination, signs of significant blood loss should be treated as a medical emergency.

Vioxx Warnings

Prior to discontinuation, Merck was required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to include two “black box warnings” on all Vioxx labeling. A black box warning is the most severe warning that the FDA can give. A black box warning is also called a “boxed statement” and must be included at the top of prescribing information in a box with a thick, black border.

The black box warning for Vioxx included the link between the medication and serious cardiovascular problems and an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation.

In addition to the Vioxx black box warning, it was also contraindicated and should not be given to patients who:

• Have a known allergy or sensitivity to rofecoxib
• Have a history of asthma or allergy after taking aspirin or other NSAIDs
• Have recently undergone heart bypass

Vioxx is considered a Category C pregnancy medication in the first 30 weeks of pregnancy, which indicates a possibility of birth defect. After 30 weeks of pregnancy, it is a Category D which indicates a high risk of birth defect.

Vioxx should be used with caution in patients who:

• Have a history of liver damage
• Have a history of kidney damage
• Have a history of cardiac illness or dysfunction
• Have a history of gastric ulcer or bleeding

Patients should discuss their medical history and medications with their health care providers.

Vioxx Heart Attack Risk & Recall

Due to its enormous popularity, the recall of Vioxx in 2004 was the largest drug recall in history at the time. It was pulled from the market after internal studies by Merck & Co. showed that patients who were prescribed Vioxx were more likely to have cardiovascular problems than patients talking a placebo.

The first (VIGOR) study indicating cardiovascular concerns was conducted to see the degree in which Vioxx was safer on the stomach than an alternative painkiller, naproxen. Results published in 2000, indicated that Vioxx patients were found to have up to five times as many heart attacks as those taking naproxen.

A second 3-year (APPROVe) study conducted to examine Vioxx effect on gastric polyps also showed a significant cardiac risk, with users experiencing cardiovascular events at twice the normal rate. Cardiovascular results were so concerning that the study was discontinued after only 18 months.

In September of 2001, the FDA sent Merck a warning letter regarding their Vioxx advertising campaign, which the FDA believed was minimizing the possible cardiovascular side effects of Vioxx. The FDA required Merck to add a warning to Vioxx concerning the cardiovascular side effects in April of 2002 based on results of the VIGOR study. A Kaiser Permanente examination of 1.4 million patient records between 1999 through 2003 showed approximately 27,785 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths that may not have occurred had Vioxx not been used.

In 2004, Merck & Co. voluntarily withdrew Vioxx from the U.S. market, but many patients had already been harmed. Additionally, scientific experts later testified that Merck had possessed scientific evidence of Vioxx’s risks to the heart by 2000 but failed to further study this concerning link.

Vioxx Lawsuits

Thousands of Vioxx lawsuits were filed against Merck for injuries caused by the medication. Hundreds of these clients were represented by Seeger Weiss, which also represented union health and welfare programs in a class action suit in New Jersey for Merck’s over-charging of union welfare funds for Vioxx.

In February 2005, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidated Vioxx lawsuits filed in federal courts across the country into the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Louisiana. Seeger Weiss’ founding partner Chris Seeger was unanimously selected by the plaintiffs’ lawyers to serve as co-lead counsel and was later appointed to this position by U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon. In this role, Chris helped lead this litigation and, working with Seeger Weiss partner Dave Buchanan, secured significant victories against Merck, including a $47.5 million award for an Idaho postal worker who suffered from a heart attack after taking Vioxx in the bellwether trial Humeston v. Merck & Co., Inc. Dave also served as co-chair of discovery for this MDL and as court-appointed liaison counsel in the New Jersey proceedings. Through these positions, Chris and Dave helped develop the overall litigation strategies used to ensure that Merck was held responsible for the harm it and Vioxx caused, and that victims received adequate compensation for injuries they incurred through taking Vioxx.

Approximately 27,000 Vioxx medical injury product-liability lawsuits were settled in 2008 when Merck agreed to pay a total of $4.85 billion. The settlement offer came after Merck lost multiple important bellwethers and early lawsuit trials for damages up in the hundreds of millions of dollars. This result came, in part, through Chris, Dave, and Seeger Weiss’s legal expertise and dedication to plaintiffs in this litigation who experienced heart problems after taking Vioxx. Additionally, in 2011, Merck paid over $1.6 billion to the Federal Government to resolve criminal charges and civil claims related to its alleged illegal promotion and marketing of Vioxx. Merck also agreed to settle a federal class action lawsuit filed by investors for $830 million in 2016. These verdicts and settlements represent a significant victory for those who were harmed by taking Vioxx and against Merck.